Ergonomic Evaluation and Optimization of Levels of Temperature, Viewing Angle and Viewing Distance on Text Readability Task
Zulquernain Mallick, Abid Haleem & Arshad Noor SiddiqueeABSTRACT
The widespread usage of computers and its prolonged use has been shown to be a risk factor for musculoskeletal and visual discomfort. This paper presents a study in which the effect of operating parameters such as levels of temperature, viewing angle and viewing distance were analyzed. In addition, the Taguchi method, a powerful tool to design and process optimization for quality, is used to find the optimal parameters for the text reading task in order to get a minimum level of visual discomfort and improved performance (from a readability point of view). The orthogonal array, the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed to obtain optimum combination of process parameters and their levels. Results show that the combination of parameters in which temperature at level 2 (27oC), viewing angle at level 1 (15o) and the viewing distance at level 2 (60 cm) produces maximum efficiency from readability point of view. It has also been found that the temperature level is the domin nt parameter with a maximum percentage contribution of 75.74% followed by the viewing angle 4.23% and viewing distance 3.12%.
Keyword: Taguchi method, Operating parameters, Readability, Temperature, Viewing angle
References
[1] Parsons, K.C. (1993). Human Thermal Environment, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 53-60.
[2] ANSI/HFES 100. U.S. (2000). National Standards for Human Factors Engineering of Computer Workstations. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
[3] Leavitt, S.B. (1995). “Lower your VDT monitor,” Workplace Ergonomics 32-35.
[4] Juola, J.F., Tiritoglu, A. and Pleunis, J. (1995). “Reading text presented on a small display,” Applied Ergonomics 26, 227-229.
[5] Sanders M.S. and McCormic, E.J. (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
[6] Villanueva, M.B.G., Sotoyama, M., Jonai, H., Takeuch, Y. and Saitu, S. (1996). “Adjustments of posture and viewing parameter of the eye to changes in the screen height of the visual display terminal,” Ergonomics 39(7), 933-945.
[7] Ankrum, D.R. and Nemeth, K.J. (1995). “Posture, comfort, and monitor placement,” Ergonomics in Design, 7-9.
[8] Turville, K.L., Psihogios, J.P. , Ulmer, T.R. and Mirka, G.A. (1998). “The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15o and 40o recommendations,” Applied Ergonomics 29, 239-246.
[9] Jaschinski-Kruza, W. (1991). “Eyestrain in VDU users: Viewing distance and the resting position of ocular muscles,” Human Factors 33, 69-83.
[10] Szeto, G.P. and Lee, R. (2002). “An ergonomic evaluation comparing desktop, notebook, and subnotebook computers,” Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83, 527-532.
[11] Shieh, K.K. (2000). “Effects of reflection and polarity on LCD viewing distance,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 25, 275-282.
[12] Wang, W.H. and Tarng, Y.S. (1998). “Design optimization of cutting parameters for turning operations based on the Taguchi method,” Journal of Material Processing Technology 84, 122-129.
[13] Fanger, P.O. (1970). Thermal Comfort (Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen).
[14] ISO 7730, (1994). Moderate thermal environment-determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfort. International Standard Organization.
[15] Straker, L., Jones, K.J. and Miller, J.A. (1997). “A comparison of the postures assumed when using laptop computers and DT computers,” Applied Ergonomics 28, 263-269.
