A Method for Determining Tool Group Flexibility with Uncertain Machine Availability – Applications in a Semiconductor Manufacturing Process
Adam Terry1, M. Ramulu2, & P.N. Rao3
1 Intel Corporation, Portland, OR
2 Program in Engineering and Manufacturing Management,
University of Washington
3 Department of Industrial Technology, University of Northern Iowa,
Cedar Falls, IA
ABSTRACT
The production of Integrated Circuits (IC) is a detailed and exacting processrequiring tight specifications and precise equipment. The high cost and unique traits of this equipment requires high utilization and maximum throughput to achieve real profits. The design of fabrication facility (FAB) processes requires a thorough understanding of the adverse effects that random machine availability has on system performance. These effects (increased cycle time, decreased and variable throughput, etc) can be offset by tool group flexibility. Tool group flexibility can be described by two measures: machine flexibility (the number of tasks a machine can perform) and task flexibility (the number of machines qualified to perform a specific task). These two measures are related by the ratio of the number of machines in the tool group to the number of tasks that the group must perform. This paper utilizes a combined linear programming and simulation approach in an attempt to model the manufacturing system to gain insight into the production dynamics. The model is based on current production methodology and the use of modular equipment (steppers). The results include some insight into the added cost of flexibility and the associated
production ramifications.
Keywords: Linear Programming (LP), Simulation, Integrated Circuit, Fabrication, Re-entrant systems, modeling, semiconductor, machine flexibility
References
[1] Van Zant, P. (2000). Microchip Fabrication, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
[2] Kumar, P.R. (1993). “Re-Entrant Lines”, Queuing Systems: Theory and Applications: Special Issue on Queuing Networks, Vol. 13, 87-100.
[3] Robinson, Jennifer, K. (1998). “Capacity Planning in a Semiconductor Wafer Fabrication Facility with Time Constraints Between Process Steps,” Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, Department of Engineering, University of
Massachusetts Amherst.
[4] Uzsoy, R., Lee, C. and Martin-Vega, L. (1992). “A Review of Production Planning and Scheduling Models in the Semiconductor Industry Part I: System Characteristics, Performance Evaluation, and Production Planning,”
IIE Transactions, Vol. 24, No. 4, 47-60.
[5] Flack, W., Flores, G., Walther, A. and Ferreira, M. (September 1994). “A Reticle Correction Technique to Minimize Lens Distortion Effects,” 14th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, Santa Clara, CA.
[6] Gupta, D. (1993). “On Measurement and Valuation of Manufacturing Flexibility”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 31, No. 12, 2947-2958.
[7] Fowler, J., Brown, S., Gold, H. and Schoemig, A. (October 1997). “Measurable Improvements in Cycle-Time Constrained Capacity,” Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing, San
Francisco, A21-A24. [8] Hase, R., Takoudis, C. and Uzsoy, R. (1997). “Alternative Facility Layouts
for Semiconductor Wafer Fabrication Facilities,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology-Part C, Vol. 20, No. 2, 152-163.
[10] Peikert, A., Thoma, J. and Brown, S. (1998). “A Rapid Modeling Technique for Measurable Improvements in Factory Performance,” Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, 1011-1015.
[11] Lu, S., Ramaswamy, D. and Kumar, P. (1994). “Efficient Scheduling Policies to Reduce Mean and Variance of Cycle-Time in Semiconductor Manufacturing Plants,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 7, No. 3, 374-388.
[12] Mittler, M. (1996). “Two-Moment Analysis of Alternative Tool Models with Random Breakdowns,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Kauai, HI, 546-552.
[13] Gupta, D., Gerchak, Y. and Buzacott, J. (1992). “The Optimal Mix of Flexible and Dedicated Manufacturing Capacities: Hedging Against Demand Uncertainties,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 309-319.
[14] Benjaafar, S. and Gupta, D. (1999). “Workload Allocation in Multi-Product, Multi-Facility Production Systems with Setup Times,” IIE Transactions, Vol. 31, No. 3, 339-352.
[15] Leachman, R. and Carmon, T. (1992). “On Capacity Modeling for Production Planning with Alternative Machine Types,” IIE Transactions, Vol. 24, No. 4, 62-72.
[16] Rohan, D. (1992). “Resource Sharing in Capacity Analysis,” IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, 39-42.
[17] Rohan, D. (1999). “Machine Dedication Under Product and Process Diversity,” Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, 897- 902.
[18] Ovacik, I. and Uzsoy, R. (1997). “Decomposition Methods for Complex Factory Scheduling Problems,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
[19] Lindo Systems Incorporated Internet Site: http://lindo.com/cgi/ frameset.cgi?leftwb.html;wbf.html
[20] Hillier, F. and Lieberman, G. (2001). Introduction to Operations Research, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
[21] Kelton, D., Sadowski, R. and Sadowski, D. (1998). Simulation with Arena, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
A Method for Determining Tool Group Flexibility with Uncertain Machine Availability – ...
